One of the CNN news stories consisted of the wives of American soldiers who had been wounded in battle. These wives were pampered with a new hairstyle and a new designer dress and shoes. Personally, I thought this was an interesting story. I thought it was a sweet idea to take these ladies, who had been put through so much, and pamper them for a day. However, in the story one of the stylists said they were going to, "make them look more beautiful", which I thought was a kind of degrading comment. Also, I the end of this story the news lady shared that the women were able to keep their designer shoes and dresses, which also had no relevance to the story. Klosterman said that the extra facts stated that have no meaning to the story, are simply done to catch your attention and to add more to the story.
Another story that we watched consisted of the infamous 'Boston Bombers'. The news reporter asked the lady who was interviewing outside of the courthouse what the boys were wearing and asked about their facial expressions, which again has no relevance to the story. Before reading Klosterman's article, I didn't notice the excess things put into news reports, but now it's too obvious and I will definitely be on the look at in more news stories to come.
Would you consider the story about the military wives an important story for the nation to hear, or more of a "fluff" piece?
ReplyDelete